Showing posts with label Research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Research. Show all posts

Agricultural & Food Law Consortium announces funding opportunity

Posted February 3, 2016
The Agricultural & Food Law Consortium is seeking formal collaboration with individuals, organizations, and institutions to conduct research and outreach activities that support the delivery of objective agricultural and food law research and information to the nation’s agricultural community. 

The announcement linked below sets out information pertaining to funding availability, the application process and timelines and other related information.  Questions and inquiries about this opportunity can be directed to Harrison Pittman, Director, National Agricultural Law Center, at hmpittm@uark.edu.

Per the announcement:

Letters of Interest are limited to two pages. Letters of Interest must set forth the specific interests and relevant expertise of the applicant(s), a narrative description of proposed project, anticipated month-by-month timelines for deliverables, and proposed funding needs. In addition, Letters of Interest must clearly indicate the agricultural and food law topic that will be addressed and the specific type of deliverable(s) that will be undertaken during the course of the project. 

Importantly, Letters of Interest must be submitted via email in letter format (PDF) to Harrison Pittman at hmpittm@uark.edu by 5:00 PM eastern on February 12, 2016.


A copy of the Consortium’s formal Call for Letters of Interest is available here.

Webinar January 20: The Power of the Web – Free Internet Legal Research

Posted January 7, 2016
On Wednesday, January 20 at 12 pm (EST), join us in our continuing webinar series sponsored by the Agricultural & Food Law Consortium. Our January webinar, entitled, The Power of the Web: Free Internet Legal Research, focuses on getting the most out of free legal materials on the internet.

As the availability of online legal materials increases, it can be difficult to know where to start and which sites are the most valuable. Legal websites vary drastically in terms of materials collected, scope of coverage and search options. Some are good for finding legal commentary, while others focus on primary law or practical legal materials. 

This free, hour-long webinar will teach you to utilize the most efficient free internet legal resources whether you are new to research or a veteran legal researcher. The webinar will also guide you to the most practical free legal materials on the web and demonstrate how to use them effectively.

The webinar presenter is Ms. Kirstin Nelson, J.D. Ms. Nelson is a Law Librarian at the National Agricultural Library in Beltsville, Maryland. Kirstin received a B.S in Social Sciences from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Master of Library Science at the University of Missouri-Columbia and J.D. at University of Baltimore. In addition to her work at the library, she teaches Advanced Legal Research at University of Maryland School of Law. Ms. Nelson previously worked at University of Maryland Law Library and as a Research Librarian at several national law firms, including DLA Piper, Steptoe & Johnson, and Blank Rome.

No pre-registration is required and this webinar is offered free of charge, but limited to the first 100 registrants. To enter the webinar on January 20, simply click here shortly before the webinar begins. We recommend testing your computer for software compatibility prior to the webinar by clicking here.

(Photo courtesy Kevin Quinn, extension video specialist)

House Panel Passed Industrial Hemp Bill


Posted February 2, 2015

A House panel passed legislation that would allow industrial hemp to be grown in Virginia, according to a Richmond Times Dispatch article available here. Go Dan River also published an article available here and WVTF here.

“If you look at the potential economic advantages that industrial hemp would provide for the state, particularly the Southside and the Southwest, it could be an economic boon in terms of the amount of research we could do on it,” said Del. Joseph R. Yost, R-Giles, the measure’s sponsor.

House Bill 1277, which passed by a 13-7 vote, would direct the state Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to establish an industrial hemp research program and relevant regulations in the commonwealth.

Last year, the Farm Bill allowed universities and state Departments of Agriculture to grow hemp for research purposes, according to Go Dan River.

“One acre of industrial hemp produces the same amount of paper pulp that 4 acres of forest does. Industrial hemp production would create jobs and economic development, particularly in rural areas in Virginia. Should federal regulations allow for commercial production in the future, this bill would ensure that we are ready to move forward in Virginia,” said Yost.

Bryan Porter, commonwealth’s attorney in Alexandria, said the Virginia Association of Commonwealth’s Attorneys does not oppose the aims of the bill but is concerned with its impact on law enforcement agencies, according to Richmond Times Dispatch.

“The way industrial hemp is designed in the bill, it refers to a particular level of THC and says that anyone who is a licensed grower and possesses industrial hemp cannot be prosecuted for the possession of marijuana,” said Porter.

“Prosecutors are concerned that this might have an effect on the backdoor unintended consequence of legalizing marijuana.”

Tetrahydrocannabinol, commonly referred to as THC, is the psychoactive component of marijuana and hemp. Under federal law, industrial hemp in the U.S. cannot contain a THC amount higher than 0.3 percent. The average THC concentration in recreational marijuana for is 5 percent or higher.

“You don’t get high from industrial hemp,” said Yost.

Jim Politus is a former farmer and member of the Montgomery County Board of Supervisors, according to WVTF.

“When you compare hemp to cotton you have about 2 and a-half times the yield, half the water needs, no pesticides, so that will help areas like Danville,” said Politus.

The bill is sponsored by Pearisburg delegate Joseph Yost, and if passed, would allow hemp research by State Universities such as Virginia Tech and Virginia State University possibly by 2016.

For more information, a recent report on hemp as an agricultural commodity from the Congressional Research Service is available on the National Agricultural Law Center's website here.

Legislation Signed to Grow Industrial Hemp in NY


Posted December 22, 2014

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed legislation to grow and research industrial hemp, according to a Press & Sun-Bulletin article available here. The Courier Journal also published an article available here and Providence Journal here.

Assemblywoman Donna Lupardo and Sen. Tom O’Mara introduced the bill, and it “creates an agricultural pilot program to study ways to cultivate and manufacture products with the multi-use crop.”

Colleges and universities such as Cornell, Binghamton University, and Paul Smith’s College, have expressed interest in participating in the research program.

The Farm Bill allowed states to conduct hemp pilot programs through their agriculture departments and universities, according to The Courier Journal.

The "amendment language confirms the legitimacy of the pilot programs," Comer spokeswoman Kristen Branscum. "It also safeguards our hemp pilot program from contradictory federal regulations that will impede the progress we've made…without fear of federal government overreach."

American Seed & Oil Company, subsidiary of Algae International Group, expressed their excitement about the industrial hemp cultivation in New York, according to Providence Journal.

"We are thrilled that American Seed & Oil's investment in New York has paid off as a result of the passage of the industrial hemp bill in New York," said Steven Rash, CEO of American Seed & Oil. "We are optimistic that this progress in New York will bode well for American Seed & Oil's national marketing strategy to introduce Medical Marijuana type strains of CBD oil from hemp into all fifty states."

A 2014 Congressional Research Service report estimated the value of hemp imports at $37 million, according to Press & Sun-Bulletin.

“This is an exciting first step for this crop,” Lupardo said. “This research will help guide our farmers and producers when the federal government allows full-scale production.”

For more information, a recent report on hemp as an agricultural commodity from the Congressional Research Service is available on the National Agricultural Law Center's website here.

OSU Hosting Big Data and UAVs Webinar Dec 12


Ohio State University’s (OSU) Agricultural & Resource Law Program has announced its inaugural webinar, Big Data and UAVs: Legal Issues for Agriculture, scheduled for Friday, December 12 at 1 p.m. 

This is the first webinar of the program’s new “Ohio Food, Agriculture and Environmental Law Webinar Series,” offering monthly legal webinars on issues of importance to Ohio agriculture. 

The webinar will feature John Dillard, an Associate Attorney with the law firm of Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz, PC in Washington, DC and a leading expert on legal issues with technology and agriculture. 

A schedule of future webinars in the Ohio Food, Agriculture and Environmental Law Webinar Series is available on their blog and will feature other national and state experts discussing legal issues of importance to Ohio agriculture. 

For more information, please visit OSU’s Agricultural Law and Taxation blog here.

North Carolina Launches AgBio[sphere]


Posted November 24, 2014

North Carolina launched an economic development platform branding the state as the “AgBio[sphere], the complete ecosystem for ag biotechnology,” according to a Southeast Farm Press article available here. WRAL Tech Wire also published an article available here.

The initiative is intended to “educate prospective agricultural biotechnology ventures about North Carolina’s ag biotech assets while streamlining market entry for research and business interests.”

“North Carolina’s agricultural roots, diverse assets and industry advantages position this state as the best global location for any ag biotech venture,” said Dr. Richard Linton, dean of North Carolina State University’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. “This new engagement platform further solidifies our global leadership and commitment to supporting and serving organizations looking for a new home. It’s a great way to welcome folks to North Carolina—the complete ecosystem for ag biotechnology,” Linton added.

AgBio[sphere] will provide a branded identity to North Carolina’s “complete value package for all facets of the industry,” including academic research, workforce development, business support programs, a strong agricultural sector and a huge $59 billion-a-year biotech industry involving some 650 companies with more than 80 firms being ag biotech, according to WRAL Tech Wire.

Steve Troxler, commissioner of the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, stated that the state’s $78 billion economy-leading ag industry has grown from its “hardscrabble subsistence plots of a century ago” with the help of research and technology.

“Technology and education will drive us again,” said Troxler, “and thanks to the Biotechnology Center and all these partnerships represented here today, there’s nothing else like this anywhere.” He predicted the state’s increasingly technology-driven ag economy “is not that far away from reaching $100 billion a year.”

For more information on biotechnology, please visit the National Agricultural Law Center’s website here.

Farm Organizations, ATPs Reach Agreement on Big Data


Posted November 14, 2014

U.S. farm organizations and agriculture technology providers (ATPs) have reached an agreement on data privacy and security principles that will “encourage the use and development of a full range of innovative, technology-driven tools and services to boost the productivity, efficiency and profitability of American agriculture,” according to an American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) release available here. The Wall Street Journal also published an article available here and Agri-Pulse here.

“The principles released today provide a measure of needed certainty to farmers regarding the protection of their data,” said Bob Stallman, president of AFBF. “Farmers using these technology-driven tools will help feed a growing world while also providing quantifiable environmental benefits. These principles are meant to be inclusive and we hope other farm organizations and ATPs join this collaborative effort in protecting farm-level data as well as educating farmers about this revolutionary technology.”

A data-driven farming approach has increased farmers’ production and reduced financial costs, but some farmers are still concerned about the safety of their information, according to The Wall Street Journal.

AFBF has warned farmers that seed companies may influence farmers to purchase more seeds or direct farmers to purchase particular equipment.

Farmers will send large amounts of business and production information to ATPs concerning their planting, production, and harvesting practices. Companies utilize that data to produce “field prescriptions and benchmarks that provide valuable information farmers can use to make decisions on when, how and which crop varieties to plant, and optimize the application of crop protection and fertilizer inputs,” according to Agri-Pulse.

Other groups or companies supporting the principles are: American Soybean Association, Beck's Hybrids, Dow AgroSciences LLC, DuPont Pioneer, John Deere, National Association of Wheat Growers, National Corn Growers Association, National Farmers Union, Raven Industries, The Climate Corporation - a division of Monsanto, and USA Rice Federation.

For more information, a copy of the data privacy and security principles agreement is available here.

USDA Seeking Input on New Beef Checkoff


Posted November 10, 2014

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is seeking public input to guide the development of a new industry-funded promotion, research, and information order for beef and beef products, according to a USDA press release available here. Beef Magazine also published an article available here and Agri-Pulse here.

The new order, also known as a “checkoff program,” would be an addition to existing beef checkoff programs and provide more marketing and research resources to strengthen the nation’s beef industry.

"Beef industry representatives agree that this important program needs more resources. USDA is stepping up at a critical juncture to help achieve the industry's goal. With this action we can boost research investments, increase beef exports, and encourage folks here at home to support American beef producers," said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.

Beef industry leaders have agreed that the existing fee of $1/head-of-cattle/producer is too little, but USDA has stated that the $1 assessment has remained the same since 1985 when Congress created the program, and the amount can only be changed through Congressional action, according to Beef Magazine.

USDA will consider written comments in developing its proposal for a Beef Promotion, Research and Information Order that provides for a promotion, research, and information program for beef and beef products under the 1996 Act until December 10. The new program would operate concurrently with the Beef Checkoff Program authorized under the authority of the 1985 Act.

Comments may be submitted online at www.regulations.gov or sent to Beef Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Research and Promotion Division, Room 2096-S; Livestock, Poultry and Seed Program; AMS, USDA, STOP 0249; 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.; Washington, D.C. 20250-0249; telephone number (202) 720-5705.

Vilsack has stated that he hopes to have the new checkoff in place by December 2015, according to Agri-Pulse.

For more information on checkoff programs, please visit the National Agricultural Law Center’s website here.

IDWR to Conduct Winter Aquifer Recharge Effort


Posted September 23, 2014

The Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) and three irrigation water providers will conduct the state’s first extensive winter aquifer recharge effort, according to a Capital Press article by John O’Connell available here.

American Falls Reservoir District No. 2, Southwest Irrigation District and Twin Falls Canal Co. joined the pilot project because of a new tiered payment program that awards greater payments per acre foot for longer durations of recharge. The program utilizes a state-held recharge right, which remains a priority throughout winter to maintain a base flow of 500 cubic feet per second below Milner.

IDWR deputy director Mat Weaver said the state has an annual goal of recharging at least 100,000 acre feet with a scheduled increase of 250,000 acre feet in the next few years. However, IDWR has only averaged 75,000 acre feet per year since 2009. The tiered structure is expected to make recharge more cost-effective during winter with no competition with canal maintenance but weather is a hassle.

IDWR is also encouraging Northside Canal Co. to participate in the project and address concerns about water freezing in hydropower turbines on the company’s main canal. Eventually, Harmon hopes to recharge every other year, rotating shifts with Northside, and conducting more in-depth system maintenance in off years.

For more information on water law, please visit the National Agricultural Law Center’s website here.

Wheat Commission Agreement Unveiled


Posted September 17, 2014

An Oregon Wheat Commission administrator introduced terms of agreement between the commission and Oregon State University (OSU), according to a Capital Press article available here.

The terms were revealed at the OSU extension meeting and define how OSU spends royalties on OSU-developed wheat varieties.

According to the agreement, 75 percent of royalties collected by the university will be reallocated into the wheat breeding program. Five percent of royalties will support Crop and Soil Science Department, 10 percent will support variety inventors, and 10 percent to the OSU Research Office.

“That is much improved from the old system,” said Blake Rowe, Oregon Wheat Commission CEO. “I think it is a very good agreement.”

Mike Flowers, OSU Extension Cereals Specialist, stated that the agreement significantly decreases the percentage of royalty funds that will be recycled back into the wheat breeding program.

In the past few years, OSU has collected $1.2 million and $1.5 million a year in royalties through a 2 percent royalty on Clearfield varieties.

“(The Research Office) has been getting $400,000 or $500,000 a year the last five years or so,” Flowers said. “That is a big chunk of change, and growers wanted to see some of that come back into the program.”

For more information on commodity programs, please visit the National Agricultural Law Center’s website here.

USDA Announced Availability of Funding for Tribal Land-Grant Colleges


Posted July 3, 2014

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) announced the availability of $1.7 million in funding to improve the capacity of tribal land-grant colleges to undertake food and agriculture research, according to a USDA press release available here.

This funding is made available from the 2014 Farm Bill.

“These grants will help tribal land-grant colleges develop infrastructure and faculty expertise so they can carry out research projects that identify and solve problems within tribal and American Indian communities,” said Sonny Ramaswamy, NIFA director. “Projects will also offer students the research experience they need to carry on their educational pursuits or enhance career opportunities in the food and agricultural sciences.”

The Tribal College Research Grant Program (TCRGP) builds “scientific capacity at tribal land-grant colleges, also known as the 1994 land-grant institutions, by creating collaborations with other land-grant institutions.”

TCRGP offers three types of funding options: New Discovery Research for projects involving peer reviewed scientific inquiry; Capacity Building Research to address a specific research concern of the reservation community; and Student Research Experience which allows tribal college students to learn scientific techniques while conducting research projects.

The deadline for applications is July 25, 2014.

For more information on farm bills, please visit the National Agricultural Law Center’s website here.

Big Data Project to Obtain Agricultural Data



Posted June 24, 2014

Iowa farm and community organizations are supporting a project that will “harness the power of agricultural data to the benefit of farmers,” according Iowa Soybean Association (ISA) release available here. Brownfield Ag News also published the article here and Pork Network here.

The “Big Data Strategy and Implementation Plan” is backed by Iowa AgState and was developed by the Hale Group of Danvers, Mass. The plan aims to immediately obtain all relevant facts about how agricultural data is collected, shared, analyzed, and used.

Brian Kemp, ISA president and AgState chair, said that Big Data is not a new issue for agriculture, but the ability to collect, interpret, and manipulative data is an increasing issue that requires action.

“This project will be conducted at the strategic level addressing many components, namely data ownership and control,” said Kemp, who farms near Sibley. “By harnessing the knowledge of existing data and how it can be used, farmers can influence policy more effectively, develop appropriate user and privacy agreements and drive mutually beneficial relationships with those whom we do business.”

Dean Lemke, nutrient management and environmental stewardship director of the Agribusiness Association of Iowa and member of the AgState Big Data task force, said the project complements other regional and national projects focused on similar issues.

“The Hale Group has unique capabilities to do the work to benefit the greater industry,” Lemke said. “They will do a thorough job of gathering information from many sources on the topic of Big Data, define what’s most meaningful to farmers and how they can capitalize on it and then share these findings with all stakeholders.”

Farmers do not wish to “stop Big Data,” however, they wish to influence the way it is developed and introduced to growers, said Bob Ludwig of The Hale Group.

For more information on checkoff programs, please visit the National Agricultural Law Center’s website here.

Senators Criticize Science-Related Farm Bill Provision

Posted January 2, 2014

Thirteen senators recently expressed concern about the potential effects of an “anti-science” provision in the House version of the farm bill, according to an Agri-Pulse article available here.

Senator Edward Markey (D-MA) and 12 other senators sent the letter, available here, to Senate Agriculture Committee leaders about the “Sound Science Act,” S. 12307 Ensuring High Standards for Agency Use of Scientific Information, of H.R. 2642.  The letter states that the provision would “make it nearly impossible for all federal agencies, including independent ones, to use science effectively to inform their decisions and protect public health, safety, and the environment.”

Senators also criticized the provision, writing that it “has the potential to eliminate the use of new, cutting edge and innovative science in agencies’ decision-making and to hinder their ability to keep up with scientific and technical advances in their jurisdictions.” 

In addition, the provision directs federal agencies to give “greatest weight to information that is based on experimental, empirical, quantifiable, and reproducible data.”  The senators said that this emphasis could be used to exclude non-reproducible research involving one-time events, such as research on the effects of the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill and the evaluation of the flowrate from the well during the disaster.”

Supporters say the provision would require peer review, the disclosure of scientific studies used in making decisions, and an opportunity for stakeholder input.

The Hill also reported on the story here.

For more information on farm bills, please visit the National Agricultural Law Center’s website here.

USDA Invests in Research to Convert Beetle-Killed Trees into Biofuel

Posted November 13, 2013

USDA recently announced an award of almost $10 million to a consortium of academic, industry and government organizations led by Colorado State University (CSU) and their partners to research the use of trees killed by beetles as a sustainable feedstock for bioenergy.  The USDA news release is available here.

The award is provided under the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) and is part of USDA’s effort to develop modern solutions for climate challenges in agriculture and natural resources management.  AFRI is provided under the 2008 Farm Bill.

Secretary Vilsack highlighted the need for passage of the new farm bill, stating:

“Infestations of pine and spruce bark beetles have impacted over 42 million acres of U.S. forests since 1996, and a changing climate threatens to expand the threat from bark beetle on our forest lands…As we take steps to fight the bark beetle, this innovative research will help take the biomass that results from bark beetle infestation and create clean, renewable energy that holds potential for job creation and promises a cleaner future for America.  This is yet another reminder of the critical investments provided by the Farm Bill for agricultural research, and I urge Congress to achieve passage of a new, long term Food, Farm and Jobs Bill as soon as possible.”

CSU researchers and scientists from other universities, government, and private industry in the region created the Bioenergy Alliance Network of the Rockies (BANR) to address these challenges, according to an article by the Aspen Business Journal available here.

“Utilization of the beetle-kill wood and other waste biomass from forest thinning and fire hazard reduction has great potential for biofuel production,” said Keith Paustian, professor at CSU and BANR project director.  “However, we need to carefully assess both the economics and environmental impacts to maximize the benefits to local communities and the country as a whole.”

For more information on renewable energy, please visit the National Agricultural Law Center’s website here.

Investments in Agricultural Research Yield High Returns

Posted September 10, 2013

Julian Alston, agricultural and resource economics professor at the University of California-Davis, says that investments in agricultural research yield high returns and are necessary for developing a solution to feed a growing world population on limited resources, according to a Drovers article, available here.

Alston spoke “about the challenge to provide safe, affordable food for a world population expected to reach 8.9 billion by 2050 during the Congressional Assistants Tour, hosted by K-State Research and Extension on August 29-30.”

Alston has researched the impact of public research funding on U.S. agriculture and found that “$1 invested in agricultural research has a return of about $33.”  Alston said, “This is a fantastically good investment…It’s not just a monetary payoff, but in addition to that it’s an investment in preserving resources.”  Details on Alston’s research and findings can be found in a book he co-authored titled, “Persistence Pays: U.S. Agricultural Productivity Growth and Benefits from Public R&D Spending.”

The U.S. Food, Conservation, and Energy Act, budgets about $150 billion in spending per year, “but only $3 billion is allocated for agricultural research.”  Alston suggests doubling funding for agriculture research to help the U.S. remain productive and competitive in the future. 

The Charitable Agricultural Research Act (CARA) was recently introduced in both houses of Congress.  This legislation would allow for the creation of new 501(c)(3) agricultural research organizations in an effort to allow private donors to assist in meeting shortfalls in agricultural research.  A recent post from this blog on the CARA is available here.

Charitable Agricultural Research Act Introduced in Congress


Posted August 27, 2013

Members of both houses of Congress recently introduced new legislation, the Charitable Agricultural Research Act (CARA).  According to an article by AgChallenge 2050, the legislation is a result of a close working relationship among Republicans and Democrats in both the House and the Senate. 
On July 11, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) introduced the bipartisan, bicameral legislation which is supported by a many co-sponsors representing a range of geographic regions and different constituencies.  The text of the Senate bill, S. 1280, is available here.  The text of the House bill, H.R. 2671 is available here. 
The CARA amends the U.S. Tax Code to allow for the creation of new 501(c)(3) agricultural research organizations.  Organizations which are “directly engaged in the continuous active conduct of agricultural research” in “conjunction with a land-grant college or university” or “a non-land grant college of agriculture” would be eligible for 501(c)(3) status.
This model is similar to medical research organizations, added to the tax code in the mid-1950s to enhance human medical research.  Sen. John Thune (R-SD) said: “In the current tight budget environment Congress needs to enact innovation legislation, such as this bill, which will encourage private donors to help meet shortfalls in agricultural research.”