It appears as though Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. will be able to pull out of bankruptcy after agreeing to a deal with JBS SA, a Brazilian beef producer. JBS is purchasing a majority stake in Pilgrim’s Pride for $800 million.
According to an Associated Press story on the deal, one of the provisions of the agreement is that Pilgrim’s Pride’s creditors will be paid in full and current stock holders will receive new stock, which, according to the AP, is unusual “for a company in bankruptcy protection.” JBS SA announced another deal today, one that has the company merging with Bertin SA. Bertin SA is one of the largest producers of milk products, beef, and leather in Latin America. The combination of the two deals will make JBS one of the largest meat producers in the world.
JBS says that JBS-Bertin will indeed by the world’s largest meat producer in terms of income. JBS-Bertin expects an annual income of $28.7 billion, which would put it above Tyson Foods Inc. of Springdale, Arkansas. According to Arkansas Business online, Tyson’s revenue for fiscal 2008 was $27 billion.
The details of the deal: 1) Pilgrim’s Pride will sell 64 percent of the reorganized company’s stock to JBS for $800 million in cash; 2) current Pilgrim’s Pride shareholders will “receive shares in the remaining 36 percent of Pilgrim’s Pride valued at $450 million; 3) Pilgrim’s Pride’s debt of $1.5 billion will be paid off. In its entirety the transaction is worth $2.8 billion, according to JBS.
Pilgrim’s Pride filed for bankruptcy protection late last year. Prior to that, the company was the “nation’s largest chicken producer with about 23 percent of the U.S. market [.]” The deal provides JBS with an entry into the US chicken market through Pilgrim’s Pride. With these deals, JBS will now be the “largest beef producing company in Brazil, Australia, Argentina and Italy.”
According to Pilgrim’s Pride, “the deal is subject to antitrust clearance,” and earlier this year U.S. regulators sued to prevent JBS from acquiring a top beef producer. The reason the regulators gave for the suit was pricing concerns for producers and consumers. This caused the deal with National Beef Packing Co. to be dropped. Pilgrim’s Pride creditors holding claims will either be issued a new note or will be paid in cash, and Pilgrim’s Pride believes that if “U.S. bankruptcy court approves the deal, the company could emerge from court protection by December.”
Senior Chairman Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim made the following statement about the deal, “While the past year has been a difficult time for everyone involved in our restructuring, I take pride in knowing that we have a plan in place to pay back our creditors in full and preserve a great deal of value for our existing stockholders[.]"
To read the AP story click here.
To read the Arkansas Business story click here.
Posted: 09/16/09

Search This Blog
Content Areas
- Administrative Law (36)
- Agricultural Economics (184)
- Agritourism (30)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (17)
- Animal Feeding Operations (136)
- Animal Identification (26)
- Animal Law (39)
- Animal Welfare (158)
- Announcement (259)
- Antitrust (1)
- Aquaculture (42)
- Bankruptcy (15)
- Biosecurity (32)
- Biotechnology (132)
- Blogs (18)
- Business Organizations (1)
- Checkoff Programs (11)
- Clean Air Act (5)
- Clean Water Act (113)
- Climate Change (147)
- Commercial Transactions (24)
- Commodity Programs (94)
- Congress (310)
- Conservation Programs (77)
- Cooperatives (16)
- Corporate Farming Laws (11)
- Country of Origin Labeling (43)
- Crop Insurance (92)
- Disaster Assistance Programs (17)
- Drought (24)
- Endangered Species Act (11)
- Environmental Law (268)
- EPA (139)
- Estate Planning and Taxation (28)
- Farm Bill (202)
- FDA (97)
- Finance and Credit (76)
- Food Labeling (176)
- Food Law (162)
- Food Safety (373)
- Food Security (18)
- Forestry (26)
- GIPSA (12)
- Hemp (11)
- House Agriculture Committee (17)
- Immigration (10)
- International Law and Organizations (175)
- International Trade (234)
- Labor (57)
- Landowner Liability (38)
- Leases (13)
- Local Food Systems (88)
- Marketing Orders (18)
- NALC Resource (20)
- NASDA (2)
- National Organic Program (42)
- Nutrition Programs (118)
- Packers and Stockyards Act (30)
- Perishable Agricultural Commodities (27)
- Pesticides (70)
- Production Contracts (19)
- Renewable Energy (185)
- Research (16)
- Right to Farm (13)
- Rural Development (111)
- Secured Transactions (12)
- Senate Ag Committee (20)
- Specialty Crops (30)
- Sustainable Agriculture (106)
- Urbanization and Agriculture (46)
- USDA (600)
- USDA HWFRCP (8)
- Water Law (136)
Related Blogs
- AgMag by the EWG
- Agricultural Law - The official blog of the AALS section on agricultural law
- AgWired
- Animal ID Systems
- Arkansas Electric Energy Law Blog
- Beginning Farmers
- Blog for Rural America
- Blogiculture
- Corn Commentary
- Dairy Cast
- DTN Ag Policy Blog
- DTN's Minding Ag’s Business
- eXtension's Blog
- Farm Aid
- Farm Future's D.C. Dialogue by Jacqui Fatka
- Farm Future's This Business of Farming Blog by Mike Wilson
- Farmer-Veteran Coalition
- FarmersReport.com
- FarmPolicy.com
- Food-Label-Compliance.com
- InfoFarm: The National Ag Library's Blog
- Iowa Farmers Union
- Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture & Natural Resource Law's Blog
- Marketmaker's
- Marler Blog
- Nebraska Corn Kernels
- Obama Foodorama
- Ohio Agricultural Law Blog
- Oklahoma Agriculture Blog
- Rincker Law's Agriculture Blog
- Southeast AgNET
- The Farm Gate
- The Rural Blog
- The Westerner
- U.S. Food Policy
- Washington View
- What to Eat
