Nick Rees, of Legal News Line online, reports that Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan has joined the federal lawsuit “challenging Dean Foods Company’s acquisition of the milk business of one of its major competitors.”
The complaint against Dean Foods, which is being brought by the US Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and the attorneys general of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Illinois in US District Court in Milwaukee, alleges that Dean Foods’ acquisition of Foremost Farms “substantially reduced competition in the sale of milk to supermarkets, grocery stores and other commercial customers throughout northeastern Illinois, the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and Wisconsin. Retailers, the complaint says, were deprived of the benefits of substantial head-to-head competition between Dean Foods and Foremost Farms as a result of the acquisition.”
As Brent Kendall reports for the Wall Street Journal, this is the first time the “Obama administration’s antitrust team at the Justice Department, led by Christine Varney, has sued to block or undo an acquisition.” Kendall reports that Varney had pledged to look into competition issues in the agriculture industry. Further, the administration could have been motivated to take up this suit because of the potential effect of the acquisition on competition in milk sold to US schools.
According to Kendall, “[t]he lawsuit not only seeks to undo the transaction but also seeks to require that Dallas-based Dean Foods, the country's largest processor and distributor of dairy products, notify the Justice Department at least 30 days in advance before any future acquisition of a milk-processing operation.”
In court documents, antitrust regulators said the acquisition “substantially weakened competition in certain dairy markets” when Dean Foods acquired Foremost Farms USA’s consumer-products division, eliminating a serious competitor even though Dean Foods only acquired two Wisconsin dairy-processing plants from Foremost.
For their part, “Dean Foods’ spokeswoman Marguerite Copel said the company was disappointed the Justice Department chose to challenge the transaction nearly 10 months after it closed. The lawsuit, she said, was ‘unsound, both legally and economically.’. . . ‘We are anxious to have the opportunity to defend this pro-competitive transaction in court,’ Ms. Copel said.”
Foremost Farms is not a party to the lawsuit and would not comment on the suit.
To read the Kendall article in the Wall Street Journal click here.
To read the Legal News Line story click here.
Posted: 01/26/10
Search This Blog
Content Areas
- Administrative Law (36)
- Agricultural Economics (184)
- Agritourism (30)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (17)
- Animal Feeding Operations (136)
- Animal Identification (26)
- Animal Law (39)
- Animal Welfare (158)
- Announcement (259)
- Antitrust (1)
- Aquaculture (42)
- Bankruptcy (15)
- Biosecurity (32)
- Biotechnology (132)
- Blogs (18)
- Business Organizations (1)
- Checkoff Programs (11)
- Clean Air Act (5)
- Clean Water Act (113)
- Climate Change (147)
- Commercial Transactions (24)
- Commodity Programs (94)
- Congress (310)
- Conservation Programs (77)
- Cooperatives (16)
- Corporate Farming Laws (11)
- Country of Origin Labeling (43)
- Crop Insurance (92)
- Disaster Assistance Programs (17)
- Drought (24)
- Endangered Species Act (11)
- Environmental Law (268)
- EPA (139)
- Estate Planning and Taxation (28)
- Farm Bill (202)
- FDA (97)
- Finance and Credit (76)
- Food Labeling (176)
- Food Law (162)
- Food Safety (373)
- Food Security (18)
- Forestry (26)
- GIPSA (12)
- Hemp (11)
- House Agriculture Committee (17)
- Immigration (10)
- International Law and Organizations (175)
- International Trade (234)
- Labor (57)
- Landowner Liability (38)
- Leases (13)
- Local Food Systems (88)
- Marketing Orders (18)
- NALC Resource (20)
- NASDA (2)
- National Organic Program (42)
- Nutrition Programs (118)
- Packers and Stockyards Act (30)
- Perishable Agricultural Commodities (27)
- Pesticides (70)
- Production Contracts (19)
- Renewable Energy (185)
- Research (16)
- Right to Farm (13)
- Rural Development (111)
- Secured Transactions (12)
- Senate Ag Committee (20)
- Specialty Crops (30)
- Sustainable Agriculture (106)
- Urbanization and Agriculture (46)
- USDA (600)
- USDA HWFRCP (8)
- Water Law (136)
Related Blogs
- AgMag by the EWG
- Agricultural Law - The official blog of the AALS section on agricultural law
- AgWired
- Animal ID Systems
- Arkansas Electric Energy Law Blog
- Beginning Farmers
- Blog for Rural America
- Blogiculture
- Corn Commentary
- Dairy Cast
- DTN Ag Policy Blog
- DTN's Minding Ag’s Business
- eXtension's Blog
- Farm Aid
- Farm Future's D.C. Dialogue by Jacqui Fatka
- Farm Future's This Business of Farming Blog by Mike Wilson
- Farmer-Veteran Coalition
- FarmersReport.com
- FarmPolicy.com
- Food-Label-Compliance.com
- InfoFarm: The National Ag Library's Blog
- Iowa Farmers Union
- Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture & Natural Resource Law's Blog
- Marketmaker's
- Marler Blog
- Nebraska Corn Kernels
- Obama Foodorama
- Ohio Agricultural Law Blog
- Oklahoma Agriculture Blog
- Rincker Law's Agriculture Blog
- Southeast AgNET
- The Farm Gate
- The Rural Blog
- The Westerner
- U.S. Food Policy
- Washington View
- What to Eat