Lawyers, health and welfare advocates, product manufacturers, and perhaps even farmers might want to pay attention to a story coming out of South Carolina that is starting to get national attention.
Jerri Gray has a son named Alexander Draper Gray, who, at the age of 14 weighed 555 lbs. Alexander’s weight prompted South Carolina authorities to arrest Gray in June and charge her with criminal neglect, reports Ron Barnett in the USA Today. After finding Gray and Alexander in Baltimore, MD, Gray has been brought back to South Carolina to face her charges and Alexander is currently in foster care.
Barnett reports that Gray’s arrest warrant was issued after she failed to appear at a previous court hearing in which Alexander was to be turned over to foster care. The State Department of Social Services was alerted of Alexander’s health, after which they moved to take custody of the child. Gray’s warrant alleges her son’s weight was ‘“serious and threatening to his health”’ and ‘“created an unreasonable risk of harm.”’
The key to the case could turn on whether or not the threat facing Alexander was imminent. Barnett writes in his article that, according to University of Virginia School of Law professor Richard Balnave, most state laws require the danger to the child be imminent, in that the parent could have taken action to prevent said danger but didn’t, before neglect is found. Since many health problems related to child obesity do not arise until adulthood it is difficult show the imminent threat, and thus charges are not filed.
For her part, Gray’s attorney Grant Varner argues his client was following nutritional guidelines set by the State Department of Social Services, so Alexander must have gained his weight while at school or when not in his mother’s immediate care, thus she is not negligent for his weight gain. Varner also points out in Barnett’s story the potential for ‘“Pandora’s box”’ to be opened (litigiously speaking) if Gray is found guilty of the charges. The question of where civil liability issues can take this area of law may become a province of the court system for some time.
Cases like Gray’s have been considered previously in Texas, Pennsylvania, California, New York, New Mexico, and Indiana. As Barnett reports, in each case, with the exception of the California case, the court moved to expand the medical definition of neglect to include “morbid obesity” and ruled the children were guilty of neglect. However, criminal charges have only been brought in California and Indiana, and the parents were not sentenced to jail time in either case.
To read the Barnett story click here. To read more information on childhood obesity click here.
Posted: 07/22/09
Search This Blog
Content Areas
- Administrative Law (36)
- Agricultural Economics (184)
- Agritourism (30)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (17)
- Animal Feeding Operations (136)
- Animal Identification (26)
- Animal Law (39)
- Animal Welfare (158)
- Announcement (259)
- Antitrust (1)
- Aquaculture (42)
- Bankruptcy (15)
- Biosecurity (32)
- Biotechnology (132)
- Blogs (18)
- Business Organizations (1)
- Checkoff Programs (11)
- Clean Air Act (5)
- Clean Water Act (113)
- Climate Change (147)
- Commercial Transactions (24)
- Commodity Programs (94)
- Congress (310)
- Conservation Programs (77)
- Cooperatives (16)
- Corporate Farming Laws (11)
- Country of Origin Labeling (43)
- Crop Insurance (92)
- Disaster Assistance Programs (17)
- Drought (24)
- Endangered Species Act (11)
- Environmental Law (268)
- EPA (139)
- Estate Planning and Taxation (28)
- Farm Bill (202)
- FDA (97)
- Finance and Credit (76)
- Food Labeling (176)
- Food Law (162)
- Food Safety (373)
- Food Security (18)
- Forestry (26)
- GIPSA (12)
- Hemp (11)
- House Agriculture Committee (17)
- Immigration (10)
- International Law and Organizations (175)
- International Trade (234)
- Labor (57)
- Landowner Liability (38)
- Leases (13)
- Local Food Systems (88)
- Marketing Orders (18)
- NALC Resource (20)
- NASDA (2)
- National Organic Program (42)
- Nutrition Programs (118)
- Packers and Stockyards Act (30)
- Perishable Agricultural Commodities (27)
- Pesticides (70)
- Production Contracts (19)
- Renewable Energy (185)
- Research (16)
- Right to Farm (13)
- Rural Development (111)
- Secured Transactions (12)
- Senate Ag Committee (20)
- Specialty Crops (30)
- Sustainable Agriculture (106)
- Urbanization and Agriculture (46)
- USDA (600)
- USDA HWFRCP (8)
- Water Law (136)
Related Blogs
- AgMag by the EWG
- Agricultural Law - The official blog of the AALS section on agricultural law
- AgWired
- Animal ID Systems
- Arkansas Electric Energy Law Blog
- Beginning Farmers
- Blog for Rural America
- Blogiculture
- Corn Commentary
- Dairy Cast
- DTN Ag Policy Blog
- DTN's Minding Ag’s Business
- eXtension's Blog
- Farm Aid
- Farm Future's D.C. Dialogue by Jacqui Fatka
- Farm Future's This Business of Farming Blog by Mike Wilson
- Farmer-Veteran Coalition
- FarmersReport.com
- FarmPolicy.com
- Food-Label-Compliance.com
- InfoFarm: The National Ag Library's Blog
- Iowa Farmers Union
- Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture & Natural Resource Law's Blog
- Marketmaker's
- Marler Blog
- Nebraska Corn Kernels
- Obama Foodorama
- Ohio Agricultural Law Blog
- Oklahoma Agriculture Blog
- Rincker Law's Agriculture Blog
- Southeast AgNET
- The Farm Gate
- The Rural Blog
- The Westerner
- U.S. Food Policy
- Washington View
- What to Eat