If the summer’s often heated political exchange on the big issues of the day taught us anything, there is a lot to a label, and once a label is fixed it is hard to change public perception. Think, “Death Panels,” or “Swine Flu.”
This has long been the story behind efforts to repeal the Estate Tax as proponents of a full repeal of the tax have insisted on calling the tax the “Death Tax” though no such label actually appears in the thousands of pages that make up the American tax code. The Oklahoma Farm Report writes that “Late last week, a coalition of business groups – including the American Farm Bureau Federation, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) – told members of Congress they would support a 35 percent estate tax rate with a five million dollar exemption, an alleged compromise, needed, they said, to provide “permanency and certainty” for small businesses and farms.”
This concession by these politically powerful organization greatly improves the chance that a compromise on the estate tax could be reached. However, other organizations are upset at the Farm Bureau for reaching for a compromise.
Dick Patten, president of the American Family Business Institute (AFBI) stated in the Oklahoma Farm report story that, “business groups already are running for the barricades, before the fight begins, seeking compromise instead of victory. We don’t consider a 35 percent tax rate an acceptable compromise. What it is, is highway robbery. What it is, is a formula for destroying family businesses, slowing economic growth, discouraging job creation. What it is, is a continuing threat to the future of millions of family businesses and family farms, the backbone of our economy and the heart and soul of many rural communities across America. ”
AFBI has a reason to be worried about the decisions of the business organizations as they carry much more power on Capitol Hill than the AFBI. The proof is in the campaign endorsements and contributions, along with the number of “blast faxes” the organizations send Members of Congress on any vote that affects their constituencies and how those members end up voting after receiving the faxes.
The decision of the coalition does, indeed, leave the door open for compromise legislation to pass before the estate tax reverts back to its previous rate of 55 percent. Still Patten thinks the 35 percent agreement should be the starting point in negotiations and not the end goal. Of course, until there is a repeal or certainty given to the estate tax or “Death Tax,” it will loom as a tricky political issue that needs resolving.
To read the Oklahoma Farm Report story click here.
Posted: 10/13/09
Search This Blog
Content Areas
- Administrative Law (36)
- Agricultural Economics (184)
- Agritourism (30)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (17)
- Animal Feeding Operations (136)
- Animal Identification (26)
- Animal Law (39)
- Animal Welfare (158)
- Announcement (259)
- Antitrust (1)
- Aquaculture (42)
- Bankruptcy (15)
- Biosecurity (32)
- Biotechnology (132)
- Blogs (18)
- Business Organizations (1)
- Checkoff Programs (11)
- Clean Air Act (5)
- Clean Water Act (113)
- Climate Change (147)
- Commercial Transactions (24)
- Commodity Programs (94)
- Congress (310)
- Conservation Programs (77)
- Cooperatives (16)
- Corporate Farming Laws (11)
- Country of Origin Labeling (43)
- Crop Insurance (92)
- Disaster Assistance Programs (17)
- Drought (24)
- Endangered Species Act (11)
- Environmental Law (268)
- EPA (139)
- Estate Planning and Taxation (28)
- Farm Bill (202)
- FDA (97)
- Finance and Credit (76)
- Food Labeling (176)
- Food Law (162)
- Food Safety (373)
- Food Security (18)
- Forestry (26)
- GIPSA (12)
- Hemp (11)
- House Agriculture Committee (17)
- Immigration (10)
- International Law and Organizations (175)
- International Trade (234)
- Labor (57)
- Landowner Liability (38)
- Leases (13)
- Local Food Systems (88)
- Marketing Orders (18)
- NALC Resource (20)
- NASDA (2)
- National Organic Program (42)
- Nutrition Programs (118)
- Packers and Stockyards Act (30)
- Perishable Agricultural Commodities (27)
- Pesticides (70)
- Production Contracts (19)
- Renewable Energy (185)
- Research (16)
- Right to Farm (13)
- Rural Development (111)
- Secured Transactions (12)
- Senate Ag Committee (20)
- Specialty Crops (30)
- Sustainable Agriculture (106)
- Urbanization and Agriculture (46)
- USDA (600)
- USDA HWFRCP (8)
- Water Law (136)
Related Blogs
- AgMag by the EWG
- Agricultural Law - The official blog of the AALS section on agricultural law
- AgWired
- Animal ID Systems
- Arkansas Electric Energy Law Blog
- Beginning Farmers
- Blog for Rural America
- Blogiculture
- Corn Commentary
- Dairy Cast
- DTN Ag Policy Blog
- DTN's Minding Ag’s Business
- eXtension's Blog
- Farm Aid
- Farm Future's D.C. Dialogue by Jacqui Fatka
- Farm Future's This Business of Farming Blog by Mike Wilson
- Farmer-Veteran Coalition
- FarmersReport.com
- FarmPolicy.com
- Food-Label-Compliance.com
- InfoFarm: The National Ag Library's Blog
- Iowa Farmers Union
- Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture & Natural Resource Law's Blog
- Marketmaker's
- Marler Blog
- Nebraska Corn Kernels
- Obama Foodorama
- Ohio Agricultural Law Blog
- Oklahoma Agriculture Blog
- Rincker Law's Agriculture Blog
- Southeast AgNET
- The Farm Gate
- The Rural Blog
- The Westerner
- U.S. Food Policy
- Washington View
- What to Eat